Hi all, Please excuse the naive question: Is the upshot of this conversation that RPMs should not be used to deliver closed-source applications written in Python? Thanks Scott On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:07:58AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> On Thursday 11 February 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> >>> And yes, the Guidelines aren't explicit about needing to include >>> them... >>> it's been standard practice since forever. If people feel a need >>> to make >>> it explicit write a draft. >> >> Here goes, insert after "Byte compiled files": >> >> Source files >> ------------ >> >> Source files (*.py) must be included in the same packages as the >> byte-compiled >> versions of them. >> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_py_removal%28draft%29 > > Feel free to modify it, I was aiming at pulling several elements on > the page > that seemed to belong together into one section rather than changing > the > meaning of anything you wrote. > > -Toshio > -- > packaging mailing list > packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
