Hi all, On 02/03/2010 08:41 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > From the summary for today's meeting: > """ > The committee started voting on new Guidelines for python modules that > includes Guidelines for python3 but suffered network difficulties in the > middle of the discussion. This will ocntinue on the packaging mailing list > and hopefully be voted on later this week. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Python3 > > Current state: > > For: 3 rdieter, tibbs, abadger1999 > > Against: 1 racor racor wants to have a note in the guidelines of when the > python-2.x package will be removed from Fedora. Other committee members > argued that this was 1) out of scope for the FPC (would be a packagr or > FESCo decision) and 2) impossible to know at this juncture as the uptake of > python3 among module authors is not yet very high -- that leads to no one > being able to port because their dependencies have not been > ported. > """ > Logs of this portion are at: > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-03/fedora-meeting.2010-02-03-16.04.log.html#l-175 > > I'd like to have the vote continued, here on the mailing list to see if we > can either get the 5 +1's we need or dig up issues that must be addressed. > There is a Fedora 13 Feature that depends on this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python3F13 > > We should at least have some idea of whether there's large remaining > problems to be worked out in the Guidelines for Feature Freeze (Tues next week). > > hansg was a +1 provided no big problems were brought up but couldn't be > present for the discussion. Hans, are you still +1 after racor's objection? > Yes I'm still +1 Regards, Hans -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
