From the summary for today's meeting: """ The committee started voting on new Guidelines for python modules that includes Guidelines for python3 but suffered network difficulties in the middle of the discussion. This will ocntinue on the packaging mailing list and hopefully be voted on later this week. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Python3 Current state: For: 3 rdieter, tibbs, abadger1999 Against: 1 racor racor wants to have a note in the guidelines of when the python-2.x package will be removed from Fedora. Other committee members argued that this was 1) out of scope for the FPC (would be a packagr or FESCo decision) and 2) impossible to know at this juncture as the uptake of python3 among module authors is not yet very high -- that leads to no one being able to port because their dependencies have not been ported. """ Logs of this portion are at: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-03/fedora-meeting.2010-02-03-16.04.log.html#l-175 I'd like to have the vote continued, here on the mailing list to see if we can either get the 5 +1's we need or dig up issues that must be addressed. There is a Fedora 13 Feature that depends on this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python3F13 We should at least have some idea of whether there's large remaining problems to be worked out in the Guidelines for Feature Freeze (Tues next week). hansg was a +1 provided no big problems were brought up but couldn't be present for the discussion. Hans, are you still +1 after racor's objection? limburgher, sorry we couldn't resolve you being able to speak in channel until after the meeting. Care to cast your vote? rathann, SmootherFrOgZ, spot, your votes would also be appreciated. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpxrm1keTBul.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
