Re: Inaccurate information about LiVES package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/01/2010 06:50 PM, salsaman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Ralf Corsepius<rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
>    
>> On 06/01/2010 06:26 PM, salsaman wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Jarod Wilson<jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>   wrote:
>>>
>>>   On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:11:19PM -0300, salsaman wrote:
>>>        
>>>>          
>>>        
>>   In the meantime, perhaps you could include LiVES in fedora, since as I
>>      
>>> have
>>> pointed out, ffmpeg/mplayer/mencoder are *not* required for either
>>> building
>>> or running the application.
>>>
>>>        
>> Which functional regressions will a missing dependency cause?
>>
>>
>>      
> When you try to open a video type which LiVES doesn't have a decoder for,
> the user will get an error "LiVES was unable to extract either video or
> audio from this file."
>
>
>
>    
>>   LiVES will check at runtime if any of these are
>>      
>>> available so users who wish to use "restricted" codecs can either build
>>> mplayer from source or pull it from another distro.
>>>
>>>        
>> It has a dependency on mpegtools (N/A in Fedora).
>>
>>      
> mjpegtools is an optional dependency. Without it you will lose support for
> live camera inputs and yuv4mpeg streaming.
>
> (Actually, LiVES doesn't even use the mpeg part of it, it just uses some
> #defines from yuv4mpeg.h).
>    
My vote: Let LiVES go into RPMFusion and don't ship functionally 
degraded packages in Fedora.

Ralf


--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux