tis 2010-07-06 klockan 11:40 -0400 skrev Tom "spot" Callaway:
> Lets say you have BuildRequires: foo%{?_isa}. Koji makes the SRPM on a
> ppc builder, so %{_isa} is evaluated as (ppc-32). The SRPM is then
> handed to an x86_64 builder to build for x86_64, but it cannot meet the
> BuildRequires because foo(ppc-32) is not found.
>
> ~spot
This is not how it works.
rpmbuild re-evaluates the BuildRequires from the specfile inside the
SRPM, it does not use the SRPM's Requires. Having %{?_isa} in
BuildRequires tags is perfectly legal - and advisable to have if you
want your SRPMs to be buildable in a multiarch environment.
Mattias
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
