On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 15:04 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: > I brought up the issue of arch-specific Requires some months ago in > response to problems I experienced with xulrunner. This issue has > reared its head again with gvfs on F13: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573183 > > I've put up this draft: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ArchSpecificRequires > > Comments welcome. > James Antill added this text re: when Requires should *not* be arch-specific: A package has a Build-Requires on a specific arch. library (because rpmbuild evaluates the %{_isa} at .src.rpm buildtime, and not at .src.rpm => .arch.rpm build time). I don't understand what this is saying. Can anyone put this in more lucid terms? -- Braden McDaniel <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
