On 07/07/2010 02:53 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> tis 2010-07-06 klockan 11:40 -0400 skrev Tom "spot" Callaway:
>
>> Lets say you have BuildRequires: foo%{?_isa}. Koji makes the SRPM on a
>> ppc builder, so %{_isa} is evaluated as (ppc-32). The SRPM is then
>> handed to an x86_64 builder to build for x86_64, but it cannot meet the
>> BuildRequires because foo(ppc-32) is not found.
>>
>> ~spot
>
> This is not how it works.
>
> rpmbuild re-evaluates the BuildRequires from the specfile inside the
> SRPM, it does not use the SRPM's Requires. Having %{?_isa} in
> BuildRequires tags is perfectly legal - and advisable to have if you
> want your SRPMs to be buildable in a multiarch environment.
Sorry, my bad, you're correct. rpmbuild does re-evaluate it, perhaps yum
does not when koji tries to populate the buildroot?
~spot
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
