> On 07/07/2010 02:53 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> > tis 2010-07-06 klockan 11:40 -0400 skrev Tom "spot" Callaway:
> >
> >> Lets say you have BuildRequires: foo%{?_isa}. Koji makes the SRPM on a
> >> ppc builder, so %{_isa} is evaluated as (ppc-32). The SRPM is then
> >> handed to an x86_64 builder to build for x86_64, but it cannot meet the
> >> BuildRequires because foo(ppc-32) is not found.
> >>
> >> ~spot
> >
> > This is not how it works.
> >
> > rpmbuild re-evaluates the BuildRequires from the specfile inside the
> > SRPM, it does not use the SRPM's Requires. Having %{?_isa} in
> > BuildRequires tags is perfectly legal - and advisable to have if you
> > want your SRPMs to be buildable in a multiarch environment.
You should to let Panu know if you've fixed this process (and probably
send him the patches). This is probably the place to post them:
[Bug 554854] %{_isa} requires are propagated to source RPMs
...feel free to post the koji/yum/etc. patches there too.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
