Re: New autogenerated documentation guideline proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/8/6 seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 21:13 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> >   These packages also tend to have loads
>> > of small files (root-doc has over 20,000), all of which end up in
>> > filelists.xml, which then get processed by yum when it needs complete
>> > filelists.
>>
>> To the extent that this sort of thing is a real *general* problem, it
>> needs to be solved on the yum side.
>
> Agreed. It may become a target feature for f15- but it will involve
> changing the format of the repodata and that will be invasive.
>
>
> -sv

At least, we should not ship apidocs for normally desktop program(e.g.
gedit) and not ship duplicate format docs(e.g. shipping html pdf doc
in the same package), personally I like html docs better than doc/pdf.

I suggest to disscuss extreme big auto-generated apidocs(size > 100M)
rpm case by case, it'll be better to determine whether shipping it or
not by FESCo. I think only popular libraries are worth to ship a big
-doc subpackage, other library packages should not enable generate big
doc subpackage by default, user who really need those docs can
generate -doc subpackage by running 'rpmbuild -bb with...'.

Regards,
Chen Lei
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux