Re: ownership of /usr/share/gtk-doc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:30:21 -0500
Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
>   
> > So just make all these packages have "R: gtk-doc" seems the simplest
> > solution.  
> 
> Nice analysis.  This is probably a good enough solution, closest to
> the status quo (requiring little, to no changes).
> 
> I'm ok with this and/or tibbs' suggestion of allowing individual
> packages to own the dir as well (those that don't have or want a dep
> on gtk-doc).  

So, sorry to reopen this, but I have several packages with bugs on this
and would like to know what the final decision is. 

Could the packaging Committee discuss this at their next meeting (or
just vote on list/in a ticket somewhere) and come up with a final
decision then update: 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169

With that decision? 

Thanks,

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux