On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:30:21 -0500 Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > > > So just make all these packages have "R: gtk-doc" seems the simplest > > solution. > > Nice analysis. This is probably a good enough solution, closest to > the status quo (requiring little, to no changes). > > I'm ok with this and/or tibbs' suggestion of allowing individual > packages to own the dir as well (those that don't have or want a dep > on gtk-doc). So, sorry to reopen this, but I have several packages with bugs on this and would like to know what the final decision is. Could the packaging Committee discuss this at their next meeting (or just vote on list/in a ticket somewhere) and come up with a final decision then update: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169 With that decision? Thanks, kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging