Hi again, I updated the text a bit and added it to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo === Additional changes === Some text clarifications. Declaring Packaging/JPackagePolicy as optional. Mention/allow use of %{_javadir}-x.x.x dirs. Mention how %{_jnidir} might be used in the future. Remove question about sed usage on MANIFEST.MF files. lör 2010-01-02 klockan 15:47 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström: > Hi, > > I submitted a review for java-gnome and working on that made me think > the Java guidelines needs work, so here's a suggested update: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Abo/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate > > === Changes === > > Removed some occurances of a Unicode control character that didn't seem > to belong there. > > Fixed formatting of the text under "Jar file naming". > > Hopefully clarified the text under "Directory structure". > > Changed some occuranced of "<code>%{_xxx</code>}" into > "<code>%{_xxx}</code>". > > Changed -javadoc Group tag from "Development Documentation" to > "Documentation". > > Mostly rewrote the section on JNI packaging. (See wiki.) > > Removed this text: > > The <code>%{_jnidir</code>} rpm macro defines the main JNI jar > repository. Like <code>%{_javadir</code>} it is declined in > <code>-ext</code> and <code>-x.y.z</code> variants. It follows > exactly the same rules as the <code>%{_javadir</code>}-derived > tree structure, except that it hosts JAR files that use JNI. > > <code>%{_jnidir</code>} usually expands into > <code>/usr/lib/java</code>. > > It seems to belong to the "The plan is to eventually..." part, but I > don't really understand it. Explain and I'll add something back. :) > > Partially rewrote the section on prebuilt binaries and the suggested % > prep section. (See wiki.) > > /abo > > > -- > Fedora-packaging mailing list > Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
