Re: Another clarification of the static library packaging guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:01:06 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:

> On 06/30/2010 10:37 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:14:39 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> Tcl allows static 'stub' libraries in the -devel subpackage.  See the
> >> last paragraph here:
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl
> >
> > That removes  tcl-tclxml  and  tkimg, albeit on the assumption that
> > a package with "tk" at the beginning of its name and "stub" in its
> > static library names, is a Tk package.
> 
> It also removes tdom, memchan, and itcl, which were never converted to 
> the proper Tcl package naming guidelines.

Urks. :)  Got them. Looking for /tcl in the library path should be safe.
tdom, on the other hand, resides in %_libdir, so currently I'm ignoring it
based on its tiny file size plus "stub" in its name.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux