On 11/12/2010 12:47 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > I'm currently reviewing pgRouting: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652533 > > the packager is currently using "postgresql-pgrouting" as the name, which > is alright but a bit long. There does not seem to be a policy for naming > DB add-ons yet (though I see a couple of postgresql-* packages). > > Would the same policy applied as to, say, the Python add-ons? e.g. > "if the name starts with [pP]y then you don't need the python- prefix". > > In this case, "pg" would clearly indicate that it's to be used with > PostgreSQL. I think a case could be made for an exception, yes (though our guidelines don't explicitly mention the postgresql/pg case yet). -- Rex -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
