Fedora Packaging

• Thread Index

• Re: Item for FPC consideration - changelogs
  • From: Jon Stanley
• Re: Item for FPC consideration - changelogs
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: Item for FPC consideration - changelogs
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Item for FPC consideration - changelogs
  • From: Jon Stanley
• Re: Packaging Gnac (An audio converter for GNOME)
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Packaging Gnac (An audio converter for GNOME)
  • From: Taylon Silmer
• Short intro
  • From: Maxim Burgerhout
• Re: Help needed handling package move
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Help needed handling package move
  • From: Garrett Holmstrom
• Re: Help needed handling package move
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Help needed handling package move
  • From: Garrett Holmstrom
• Re: Help needed handling package move
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Help needed handling package move
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Naming packages from apache.org
  • From: Jeroen van Meeuwen
• Let me introduce myself
  • From: Morpheusv
• Re: Packaging Gnac (An audio converter for GNOME)
  • From: Taylon Silmer
• from atalk to netatalk
  • From: HAT
• Re: Packaging Gnac (An audio converter for GNOME)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Packaging Gnac (An audio converter for GNOME)
  • From: Manuel Wolfshant
• Re: Packaging Gnac (An audio converter for GNOME)
  • From: Michal Ambroz
• Re: Packaging Gnac (An audio converter for GNOME)
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Packaging Gnac (An audio converter for GNOME)
  • From: Manuel Wolfshant
• Packaging Gnac (An audio converter for GNOME)
  • From: Taylon Silmer
• Re: Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Where should server state go?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Where should server state go?
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: [fedora-java] Naming packages from apache.org
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: [fedora-java] Naming packages from apache.org
  • From: Fernando Nasser
• Re: Naming packages from apache.org
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Emphasize correct hostname for SF.net URLs
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Suggested specification to changelog guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Suggested updated Java guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Suggested updated Java guidelines
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: [fedora-java] Naming packages from apache.org
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Naming packages from apache.org
  • From: Alexander Kurtakov
• Naming packages from apache.org
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Request for Guideline Clarification
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Suggested specification to changelog guidelines
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Suggested specification to changelog guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Request for Guideline Clarification
  • From: Rich Mattes
• Re: Our static Libraries packaging guidelines once more
  • From: Tom Lane
• Our static Libraries packaging guidelines once more
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Suggested specification to changelog guidelines
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Suggested specification to changelog guidelines
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Suggested specification to changelog guidelines
  • From: Tom Lane
• Suggested specification to changelog guidelines
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Suggested updated Java guidelines
  • From: Alexander Boström
• Re: Request for Guideline Clarification
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Request for Guideline Clarification
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Request for Guideline Clarification
  • From: Rich Mattes
• PHP Guidelines
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: how to check on upgrade rpm
  • From: Léon Keijser
• Re: how to check on upgrade rpm
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• how to check on upgrade rpm
  • From: Léon Keijser
• Re: Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: New packager
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• New packager
  • From: rootoutcast
• Submission: Httpd module mod_proxy_html (updated)
  • From: Philip A. Prindeville
• Re: file permissions, guidelines, rpmlint
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: file permissions, guidelines, rpmlint
  • From: Jon Masters
• Re: file permissions, guidelines, rpmlint
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: file permissions, guidelines, rpmlint
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: file permissions, guidelines, rpmlint
  • From: Manuel Wolfshant
• Re: file permissions, guidelines, rpmlint
  • From: Daniel P. Berrange
• Re: file permissions, guidelines, rpmlint
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: New to the packaging list
  • From: Ryan Rix
• Re: New to the packaging list
  • From: null
• New to the packaging list
  • From: rootoutcast
• file permissions, guidelines, rpmlint
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: Clarification of Static Libraries packaging guidelines
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Clarification of Static Libraries packaging guidelines
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Clarification of Static Libraries packaging guidelines
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Clarification of Static Libraries packaging guidelines
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Clarification of Static Libraries packaging guidelines
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: LSB initscript ordering issues
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: LSB initscript ordering issues
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: LSB initscript ordering issues
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Man pages Packaging Guideline
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: LSB initscript ordering issues
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: LSB initscript ordering issues
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: LSB initscript ordering issues
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• LSB initscript ordering issues
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: disttag doesn't work
  • From: Martial Paupe
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Nov 24, 2009 - 1600 UTC
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: disttag doesn't work
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• packaging Emacs-goodies - local mock build hangs running /usr/bin/idn
  • From: Arun SAG
• Re: disttag doesn't work
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: disttag doesn't work
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: disttag doesn't work
  • From: Martial Paupe
• Re: Re: How to patch against strip?
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Naming guidelines: Parents & children
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Re: disttag doesn't work
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• disttag doesn't work
  • From: Martial Paupe
• Re: Re: How to patch against strip?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Yaakov Nemoy
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Yaakov Nemoy
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Re: How to patch against strip?
  • From: Debarshi Ray
• Re: Re: How to patch against strip?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Yaakov Nemoy
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Proposal: support multiple Python minor versions
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Proposal: support multiple Python minor versions
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Proposal: support multiple Python minor versions
  • From: David Malcolm
• Re: How to patch against strip?
  • From: Tareq Al Jurf
• Re: How to patch against strip?
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Obsoletes in renamed rubygem a blocker?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Yaakov Nemoy
• Obsoletes in renamed rubygem a blocker?
  • From: Jeroen van Meeuwen
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: code vs. content
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• code vs. content
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: How to patch against strip?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-November/msg00052.html
  • From: Tareq Al Jurf
• Re: How to patch against strip?
  • From: Itamar Reis Peixoto
• How to patch against strip?
  • From: Tareq Al Jurf
• Re: does removing a package also remove package data?
  • From: Manuel Wolfshant
• Re: does removing a package also remove package data?
  • From: Seth Vidal
• Re: does removing a package also remove package data?
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: does removing a package also remove package data?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: does removing a package also remove package data?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: does removing a package also remove package data?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: does removing a package also remove package data?
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: does removing a package also remove package data?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• does removing a package also remove package data?
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: Re: File path clarification
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: daemons vs services
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• dont strip comments.
  • From: Matt Sellers
• Re: Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Duplicate files
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Duplicate files
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: Duplicate files
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: daemons vs services
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: Duplicate files
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Duplicate files
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Duplicate files
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: File path clarification
  • From: Rich Mattes
• Python 3 packaging
  • From: David Malcolm
• Re: Duplicate files
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: daemons vs services
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: Duplicate files
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: File path clarification
  • From: Rich Mattes
• Re: daemons vs services
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• daemons vs services
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: Duplicate files
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Revised Emacs add-on guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Duplicate files
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Removing file from .spec
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Re: Removing file from .spec
  • From: Thomas Janssen
• Removing file from .spec
  • From: Tareq Al Jurf
• Re: Fortran guideline issues
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Fortran guideline issues
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Proposal: naming convention for Python 3 packages and subpackages
  • From: BJ Dierkes
• Re: Python 3 compatibility update to Python guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Ownership of %{sugaractivitydir}
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python 3 compatibility update to Python guidelines
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Python 3 compatibility update to Python guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• File path clarification
  • From: Rich Mattes
• Ownership of %{sugaractivitydir}
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Python 3 compatibility update to Python guidelines
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Python 3 compatibility update to Python guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python 3 compatibility update to Python guidelines
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Proposal: naming convention for Python 3 packages and subpackages
  • From: David Malcolm
• Re: Proposal: naming convention for Python 3 packages and subpackages
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: Python 3 compatibility update to Python guidelines
  • From: David Malcolm
• Proposal: naming convention for Python 3 packages and subpackages
  • From: David Malcolm
• Re: ruby/rubygem packagers - advice needed
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• ruby/rubygem packagers - advice needed
  • From: Matthew Kent
• Re: Using Debian packaging bits in Fedora packages
  • From: Yaakov Nemoy
• Re: Help please? How do I express a dependency on a Perl module not installed in a standard place within an RPM spec file?
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Help please? How do I express a dependency on a Perl module not installed in a standard place within an RPM spec file?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Help please? How do I express a dependency on a Perl module not installed in a standard place within an RPM spec file?
  • From: richard.hellier
• Re: app wants runtime help file in /usr/share/help
  • From: David Timms
• Re: Help need to create rpm package for my java pplication
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: app wants runtime help file in /usr/share/help
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: app wants runtime help file in /usr/share/help
  • From: David Timms
• Re: Help need to create rpm package for my java pplication
  • From: Rakesh Pandit
• Re: app wants runtime help file in /usr/share/help
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Help need to create rpm package for my java pplication
  • From: sunil . sahoo
• Re: Errors in Packaging:Python#Byte_Compiled_Files
  • From: Itamar Reis Peixoto
• Re: Errors in Packaging:Python#Byte_Compiled_Files
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• app wants runtime help file in /usr/share/help
  • From: David Timms
• Errors in Packaging:Python#Byte_Compiled_Files
  • From: Ville-Pekka Vainio
• Re: updated F12 dependent packages
  • From: Sean Middleditch
• Re: updated F12 dependent packages
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• updated F12 dependent packages
  • From: Sean Middleditch
• Re: Using Debian packaging bits in Fedora packages
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Using Debian packaging bits in Fedora packages
  • From: Arun SAG
• Re: Using Debian packaging bits in Fedora packages
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Using Debian packaging bits in Fedora packages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Using Debian packaging bits in Fedora packages
  • From: Mary Ellen Foster
• Re: Garbage Collection of fc12 build [X-Post]
  • From: Rangeen Basu
• Re: Garbage Collection of fc12 build [X-Post]
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Garbage Collection of fc12 build [X-Post]
  • From: Rangeen Basu
• Re: Garbage Collection of fc12 build [X-Post]
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Garbage Collection of fc12 build [X-Post]
  • From: Rangeen Basu
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Re: new tool: rpmguard - print important differencesbetween RPMs
  • From: Syed Omer Farooq
• new tool: rpmguard - print important differences between RPMs
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Martin Gieseking
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Martin Gieseking
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Re: Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Is "ascii" a valid package name?
  • From: Martin Gieseking
• Re: .gz suffix of compressed man pages in spec files
  • From: Martin Gieseking
• Re: .gz suffix of compressed man pages in spec files
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: .gz suffix of compressed man pages in spec files
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: .gz suffix of compressed man pages in spec files
  • From: Chuck Anderson
• .gz suffix of compressed man pages in spec files
  • From: Martin Gieseking
• Re: Python 3 compatibility update to Python guidelines
  • From: David Malcolm
• Python 3 compatibility update to Python guidelines
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: %doc removal behavior
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: %doc removal behavior
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: %doc removal behavior
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: %doc removal behavior
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• %doc removal behavior
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Chris Weyl
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: Unsponsored Comaintainer?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Unsponsored Comaintainer?
  • From: Rich Mattes
• Re: Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Small change to Beware of RPath
  • From: Andrew Beekhof
• Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting on Wednesday, October 7, 2009 (1600 UTC)
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Small change to Beware of RPath
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Small change to Beware of RPath
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Small change to Beware of RPath
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Small change to Beware of RPath
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Static-only library: clarification
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Static-only library: clarification
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Static-only library: clarification
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Package Guildelines / Review Guidelines: .la archives must/should not contradiction
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: packaging a command line app to have action / servicemenu in filemanagers
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: packaging a command line app to have action / servicemenu in filemanagers
  • From: David Timms
• Re: packaging a command line app to have action / servicemenu in filemanagers
  • From: Rex Dieter
• packaging a command line app to have action / servicemenu in filemanagers
  • From: David Timms
• Fwd: Exemption for bundling local copy of system library?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Exemption for bundling local copy of system library?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Exemption for bundling local copy of system library?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Exemption for bundling local copy of system library?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Exemption for bundling local copy of system library?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Problem with creating RPM for screenlets
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Problem with creating RPM for screenlets
  • From: Tareq Al Jurf
• Ocaml sub-package issue
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Package Guildelines / Review Guidelines: .la archives must/should not contradiction
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Package Guildelines / Review Guidelines: .la archives must/should not contradiction
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: cleanup RPM Tags in Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: cleanup RPM Tags in Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• cleanup RPM Tags in Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Till Maas
• EPEL + Fortran guideline
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: What does one do when a package maintainer is unresponsive ?
  • From: steve
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: What does one do when a package maintainer is unresponsive ?
  • From: Pierre-Yves
• What does one do when a package maintainer is unresponsive ?
  • From: steve
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Seth Vidal
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Jon Masters
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Tom Lane
• Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Common Voicedata Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: "Explicit requires" and "requiring base package"
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Processing Review Requests
  • From: Jon Stanley
• Re: Processing Review Requests
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Processing Review Requests
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Processing Review Requests
  • From: Shakthi Kannan
• Re: rpm build problem
  • From: Rakesh Pandit
• rpm build problem
  • From: ram s
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 (1600 UTC)
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting on Wednesday, September 8, 2009 (1600 UTC)
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: How to run own shell script from rpm spec
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• How to run own shell script from rpm spec
  • From: ram s
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Packaging a game, need help with setgid security
  • From: Ryan Rix
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Packaging a game, need help with setgid security
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Re: Re: Packaging a game, need help with setgid security
  • From: Ryan Rix
• Re: RPM packaging for fedora 10 problem
  • From: Gary T. Giesen
• Re: Re: Re: Packaging a game, need help with setgid security
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: "Explicit requires" and "requiring base package"
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: RPM packaging for fedora 10 problem
  • From: Dan Horák
• RPM packaging for fedora 10 problem
  • From: ram s
• Re: Re: Packaging a game, need help with setgid security
  • From: Ryan Rix
• Re: AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering comments
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering comments
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: "Explicit requires" and "requiring base package"
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: "Explicit requires" and "requiring base package"
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: "Explicit requires" and "requiring base package"
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Need access to a PPC machine to debug LLVM/pure self-test issues
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Need access to a PPC machine to debug LLVM/pure self-test issues
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Need access to a PPC machine to debug LLVM/pure self-test issues
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Re: Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Directory draft (was Re: Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?)
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Re: Packaging a game, need help with setgid security
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: unwanted directory removal during rpm build
  • From: Scott Frankel
• Re: Re: F-11 to F-12 transition
  • From: Federico Hernandez
• Re: unwanted directory removal during rpm build
  • From: Mattias Ellert
• unwanted directory removal during rpm build
  • From: Scott Frankel
• Re: Packaging a game, need help with setgid security
  • From: Ryan Rix
• Re: bringing back to life a package (drivel)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Packaging a game, need help with setgid security
  • From: Andrea Musuruane
• Packaging a game, need help with setgid security
  • From: Ryan Rix
• Re: F-11 to F-12 transition
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: bringing back to life a package (drivel)
  • From: Andrey A.Kolov
• Re: bringing back to life a package (drivel)
  • From: Paul
• bringing back to life a package (drivel)
  • From: Andrey A.Kolov
• Re: how to force rpmbuild to use local libraries?
  • From: Krzesimir Nowak
• Re: how to force rpmbuild to use local libraries?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: how to force rpmbuild to use local libraries?
  • From: Krzesimir Nowak
• Re: how to force rpmbuild to use local libraries?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• how to force rpmbuild to use local libraries?
  • From: Krzesimir Nowak
• Re: directory ownership in f-spot package
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: directory ownership in f-spot package
  • From: Jon Stanley
• directory ownership in f-spot package
  • From: Christian Krause
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Christian Krause
• Re: Compat packages: Any best practices, rules, guidelines?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Compat packages: Any best practices, rules, guidelines?
  • From: Ryan Lynch
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Milos Jakubicek
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Milos Jakubicek
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: F-11 to F-12 transition
  • From: Federico Hernandez
• Re: Meeting minutes
  • From: Pierre-Yves
• Re: Meeting minutes
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Meeting minutes
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Mattias Ellert
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Meeting minutes
  • From: Pierre-Yves
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Seth Vidal
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Strawman: standardize 8-space tab width
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Minor correction to the approved MPI draft
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Minor correction to the approved MPI draft
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Package rename procedure
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Package rename procedure
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Fwd: Django plugin naming
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: getmail build failure on rawhide: No such file or directory
  • From: Dean Mander
• Re: getmail build failure on rawhide: No such file or directory
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: getmail build failure on rawhide: No such file or directory
  • From: Pierre-Yves
• Re: getmail build failure on rawhide: No such file or directory
  • From: Pierre-Yves
• getmail build failure on rawhide: No such file or directory
  • From: Dean Mander
• Django plugin naming
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Java guidelines: ant specfile template bug
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Fedora Packaging Meeting : Wednesday August 5th, 2009 :
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Packaging games?
  • From: Ryan Rix
• Re: Packaging games?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Packaging games?
  • From: Ryan Rix
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• mass-filed --excludedocs bugs
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Miroslav Lichvar
• Re: ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Milos Jakubicek
• Re: ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Miroslav Lichvar
• Re: Java guidelines: ant specfile template bug
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Java guidelines: ant specfile template bug
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: scrollkeeper templates
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Fedora Packaging Meeting : Wednesday August 5th, 2009 :
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: scrollkeeper templates
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: scrollkeeper templates
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• scrollkeeper templates
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• ldconfig -X in scriptlets?
  • From: Miroslav Lichvar
• Re: Fedora Packaging Meeting : Wednesday August 5th, 2009 :
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Fedora Packaging Meeting : Wednesday August 5th, 2009 :
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Fedora Packaging Meeting : Wednesday August 5th, 2009 :
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: How Fedora is updated/built?
  • From: Cristian Morales Vega
• Re: How Fedora is updated/built?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: How Fedora is updated/built?
  • From: Eric Springer
• Re: Re: Python package naming, "py"-exception only for source tarballs?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Python package naming, "py"-exception only for source tarballs?
  • From: Rakesh Pandit
• Re: Python package naming, "py"-exception only for source tarballs?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Python package naming, "py"-exception only for source tarballs?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: How Fedora is updated/built?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• How Fedora is updated/built?
  • From: Cristian Morales Vega
• Environment-modules & MPI drafts
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Re: ScriptletSnippets weirdness
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: ScriptletSnippets weirdness
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Dennis Gregorovic
• Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: MPI draft & EPEL specific packages
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• MPI draft & EPEL specific packages
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: "Code versus Content" clarification
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• "Code versus Content" clarification
  • From: Christian Krause
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Merge-review questions....
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Fedora Packaging Committee Seat Filled
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• ScriptletSnippets weirdness
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Merge-review questions....
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Milos Jakubicek
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Milos Jakubicek
• MPI and Fortran drafts
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Milos Jakubicek
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Doug Ledford
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Doug Ledford
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Milos Jakubicek
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Milos Jakubicek
• Re: .desktop file
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: .desktop file
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Draft for the use of environment-modules
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Braden McDaniel
• .desktop file
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: touch
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: touch
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: touch
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: touch
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• touch
  • From: Eric Tanguy
• Re: make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: need help for a init script
  • From: Milos Jakubicek
• Re: make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Christoph Wickert
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Issue with PHP Naming guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] For FPC : Change proposal to PHP Guidelines
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: [Fedora-php-devel-list] For FPC : Change proposal to PHP Guidelines
  • From: Tim Jackson
• Re: Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: David Malcolm
• Draft to prohibit use of #!/usr/bin/env
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: request to use Conflicts in new package olpc-bootanim
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• request to use Conflicts in new package olpc-bootanim
  • From: Daniel Drake
• need help for a init script
  • From: philippe makowski
• For FPC : Change proposal to PHP Guidelines
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Feedback on documentation
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• make install INSTALL="install -p" to guidelines
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• EclipsePlugins guideline need a one line modification
  • From: alcapcom
• Feedback on documentation
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: /srv usage
  • From: philippe makowski
• Re: /srv usage
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Version name for prerelease when upstream used date based versions
  • From: Fernando Nasser
• Re: /srv usage
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: /srv usage
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: /srv usage
  • From: philippe makowski
• Re: /srv usage
  • From: philippe makowski
• Re: /srv usage
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: /srv usage
  • From: Jon Stanley
• Re: /srv usage
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• /srv usage
  • From: philippe makowski
• Re: Version name for prerelease when upstream used date based versions
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Version name for prerelease when upstream used date based versions
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Version name for prerelease when upstream used date based versions
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: Version name for prerelease when upstream used date based versions
  • From: Manuel Wolfshant
• Version name for prerelease when upstream used date based versions
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Packaging RPM workflow
  • From: Shakthi Kannan
• Re: Packaging RPM workflow
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Packaging RPM workflow
  • From: Manuel Wolfshant
• Re: Packaging RPM workflow
  • From: Shakthi Kannan
• Re: Packaging RPM workflow
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Packaging RPM workflow
  • From: Shakthi Kannan
• Re: Packaging RPM workflow
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Packaging RPM workflow
  • From: Shakthi Kannan
• Fwd: Python package distribution standards
  • From: Jon Stanley
• Re: Use of optimization flags
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Should Scintilla be package as a shared library ?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: License reference for additional, non-essential example files of a package
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• License reference for additional, non-essential example files of a package
  • From: Federico Hernandez
• Re: Should Scintilla be package as a shared library ?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Should Scintilla be package as a shared library ?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Use of optimization flags
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Use of optimization flags
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: About my proposal of moving the stage to expand gem files
  • From: Jeroen van Meeuwen
• Re: Problem with tags for a package that does not use the %dist tag
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Problem with tags for a package that does not use the %dist tag
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: Problem with tags for a package that does not use the %dist tag
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Problem with tags for a package that does not use the %dist tag
  • From: steve
• Re: Problem with tags for a package that does not use the %dist tag
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Problem with tags for a package that does not use the %dist tag
  • From: steve
• Re: next FPC meeting
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Should Scintilla be package as a shared library ?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Should Scintilla be package as a shared library ?
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: next FPC meeting
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: openmpi
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: openmpi
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: openmpi
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: next FPC meeting
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: next FPC meeting
  • From: Rex Dieter
• next FPC meeting
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: Generic filtering macros...
  • From: Chris Weyl
• auto req/prov filtering, redux
  • From: Chris Weyl
• openmpi
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Java packaging questions about rpmlint messages
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Java packaging questions about rpmlint messages
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Java packaging questions about rpmlint messages
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Java packaging questions about rpmlint messages
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Java packaging questions about rpmlint messages
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: [Draft]Policy for creating filesystem subpackages
  • From: Jussi Lehtola
• Re: libspotify
  • From: Seth Vidal
• Re: [Draft]Policy for creating filesystem subpackages
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• [Draft]Policy for creating filesystem subpackages
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Re: libspotify
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: libspotify
  • From: Seth Vidal
• Re: libspotify
  • From: Rex Dieter
• libspotify
  • From: Paul
• Re: removal of pre-built files
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: Directory ownerships again
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil
• Re: Directory ownerships again
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Directory ownerships again
  • From: Orcan Ogetbil