On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 13:08 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/01/2009 11:48 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> > You seem to think that not using the dist tag saves something
> > somewhere; in reality, it just causes you exactly the trouble that
> > you're having and doesn't really buy anything since each release is
> > signed with a different key and so the packages have to be different
> > anyway.
>
> It's worth noting that this was not true when this document was
> originally written. It could probably use some additional discussion
> around how to deal with the cases where the dist tag is not in use.
> Anyone want to take a shot at that?
I wasn't aware of the complications either, since they aren't documented
anywhere.
Could we just do things the easy way, and propose the %{?dist} tag to be
made mandatory?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
