Re: Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/28/2009 12:49 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 07/27/2009 03:55 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
ca da eo es et gl hu id nb nl nn pt pt_BR sk sr sv tr zh_CN zh_TW

Wouldn't it be best just to make 'filesystem' own the whole directory
structure, and make the other packages just own the pages?

I'm inclined to agree with this. Does anyone think this is a bad idea?

IIRC, we discussed this topic several years ago and already agreed up it, then :)

IIRC², the only problem left had been agreeing upon which "languages to carry" and how let this "extended filesystem" interact with rpm --excludedocs.

[Problem: ATM, these lang-subdirs are installed by individual packages, i.e. most users only see a subset of "all languages". With an "extended filesystem" people would see all of them, with most of them being empty.
%ghosting them?]

Ralf

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux