On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:02 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 07/28/2009 12:49 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On 07/27/2009 03:55 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > >>> ca da eo es et gl hu id nb nl nn pt pt_BR sk sr sv tr zh_CN zh_TW > >> > >> Wouldn't it be best just to make 'filesystem' own the whole directory > >> structure, and make the other packages just own the pages? > > > > I'm inclined to agree with this. Does anyone think this is a bad idea? > > IIRC, we discussed this topic several years ago and already agreed up > it, then :) > > IIRC², the only problem left had been agreeing upon which "languages to > carry" and how let this "extended filesystem" interact with rpm > --excludedocs. Will the list of languages to carry be explicitly defined, or will it just be the set of all languages that have one or man pages in the group of @everything packages for that Fedora release? > > [Problem: ATM, these lang-subdirs are installed by individual packages, > i.e. most users only see a subset of "all languages". With an "extended > filesystem" people would see all of them, with most of them being empty. > %ghosting them?] > > Ralf > > -- > Fedora-packaging mailing list > Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
