Hi, there are some locale that are unowned under /usr/share/man. These directories need to be owned by a package. Many of the more used locales are owned by man/man-pages, but some more exotic are not. It looks like there are about 63 unowned directories coming from the following locale ca da eo es et gl hu id nb nl nn pt pt_BR sk sr sv tr zh_CN zh_TW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265#c17 The current suggestion is to have the package with the man pages to own these, for example the subtree under /usr/share/man/sv/ shoule be owned by dcraw-8.91-1.fc11.x86_64 fakeroot-1.12.2-21.fc11.x86_64 jwhois-4.0-13.fc11.x86_64 shadow-utils-4.1.2-13.fc11.x86_64 This doesn't seem like a clean or scaling solution and I think it would be better to have these owned by man/man-pages. This probably requires a new guideline, could you please push a matching guideline out, or perhaps just clarify what's there, as I think the intention of the guideline is indeed that the man* packages should own all such directories. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpwXang7RFVl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
