Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger@xxxxxxxxx) said: > Section 1.3 Optional functoinality is a special case of Section 1.5 > Common directory without one requiring the other. I'd combine them like > this: I've updated the proposal based on this and other feedback. > And one more idea to throw out there: How sacred is filesystem? How > costly are adding new directories to it? For something like > /etc/prelink.conf.d, adding to filesystem seems like the preferred > option. If there's little cost involved, adding to filesystem for > things like /etc/bash_completion.d also seems like the preferred > solution. If there's no reason we shouldn't be expanding filesystem, > I'd list that as an option in the directory draft as well. My main objections would be: 1) filesystem started out as just the FHS dirs 2) We don't want a bunch of orphan directories if things like prelink change 3) We don't want to tie package submission on changes that would require updates on unrelated packages in older distributions. It's a combination of philosophical (#1) and practical (#2 and #3) concerns. We could expclitly state this in the draft if you want. Bill -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
