>>>>> "SK" == Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx> writes: SK> 1. If there is a comprehensive contact list of Fedora Packagers who SK> are allowed to sponsor packages? The account system knows. Just look for the "packager" group, type "sponsor". SK> Is there a queue of review requests that is maintained, say, for SK> example a review-request that has not been reviewed for a month, SK> should be given first priority or is there any criteria as such? or SK> is it left to the Packagers? There's no policy for giving priority. The review queue is at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html SK> 3. If there is a SIG, and exists a group of Packagers who can SK> sponsor a package within the SIG, how do they coordinate as to which SK> packages need to be reviewed first, or in what order? I would suppose they would communicate with each other in some fashion. That kind of thing isn't going to be regulated by any policy. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
