On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Just a question about this: If we need to pass extra options to the > dependency scripts (as in the example specfile below), can we still do > that? > > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ocaml-pxp/ocaml-pxp.spec?revision=1.11&view=markup I should probably add that the need to use the '-i' option is really a hack to workaround a bug in the script. The problem is that if an OCaml library has submodules, like: Module Module.Submodule1 Module.Submodule2 then ocaml-find-requires will export Requires digests for Module, Submodule1 and Submodule2. (It should only export them for Module). ocaml-find-provides will only make digests for Module, so you get broken dependencies. Adding -i Submodule1 -i Submodule2 in this case is a hack to say "those are submodules, don't export them". I tried a long time ago to resolve this with upstream but didn't get anywhere as it seems like a subtle problem with the implementation of modules-vs-submodules which I don't fully understand. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/ See what it can do: http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/recipes.html -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
