On 10/19/2009 06:34 PM, Martin Gieseking wrote:
Hi, according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988#c14 packages shouldn't get names that are general terms like "parser" or "smtp". If this is actually the case, "ascii" is probably an inappropriate name too. Should the package requested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523799 therefore be prefixed or renamed even if "ascii" is the upstream name? Or is it OK as is, after all?
Well, Debian has this package under it's original name. However, IMO, the better question would be: Why should Fedora ship it? Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
