Am 19.10.2009 19:15, schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 10/19/2009 06:34 PM, Martin Gieseking wrote:
according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988#c14
packages shouldn't get names that are general terms like "parser" or
"smtp". If this is actually the case, "ascii" is probably an
inappropriate name too.
Should the package requested in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523799
therefore be prefixed or renamed even if "ascii" is the upstream name?
Or is it OK as is, after all?
Well, Debian has this package under it's original name.
Sorry for bothering again. I'm still not sure whether renaming of
package "ascii" is required or just recommended. Does Ralf's remark
about Debian indicate that Fedora could ship the package under its
original name too? I'm a bit confused. :)
Regards,
Martin
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
