Le Mer 14 octobre 2009 05:47, Chris Weyl a écrit : > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> That part of the review guidelines has always struck me as bizarre. >> After all, wouldn't it seem even better to compare the actual tarballs >> with each other, byte-by-byte, than relying on a checksum ? > > Um. An easily reproducible, cryptographically strong checksum? :) This is one test I never do, nothing will stop the packager from changing the packaged archive as soon as the review is finished, so the whole thing is a major waste of time for everyone involved IMHO (as is posting specs in addition to SRPMs BTW. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
