Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

NM> This is one test I never do, nothing will stop the packager from
NM> changing the packaged archive as soon as the review is finished, so
NM> the whole thing is a major waste of time for everyone involved IMHO

Perhaps I'd consider agreeing if doing the comparison hadn't turned up
real issues.  Perhaps you haven't done sufficient reviews to come across
a case like that, but I have.

 - J<

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux