Re: Is md5sum compulsion in review instead sha1sum?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Le Mer 14 octobre 2009 19:55, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
>
>>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> NM> This is one test I never do, nothing will stop the packager from
> NM> changing the packaged archive as soon as the review is finished, so
> NM> the whole thing is a major waste of time for everyone involved IMHO
>
> Perhaps I'd consider agreeing if doing the comparison hadn't turned up
> real issues.  Perhaps you haven't done sufficient reviews to come across
> a case like that, but I have.

This is something for the BADURL script or autoqa, IMHO. The ROI on doing it
manually, and only on the initial submission, is pretty low.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux