On 18/07/09 15:00, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
The PHP guidelines seem rather clear that PHP modules all require a "php-" prefix (with some types of modules requiring additional designations like "php-pear-"). Recently I noticed that two modules, phpFlickr and phpSmug, were both submitted and approved. I held off on doing CVS for the latter; the reviewer's reasoning is as follows: "The php guidelines not withstanding, php-phpSmug struck me as unnecessary duplication and the same with php-phpFlickr."
I can see the point, but I agree think we should leave the guidelines as is. php-phpFlickr *does* sound a bit clumsy, but at least it's consistent. Otherwise, if I saw phpXXX in a package listing, I would think it's an app like phpMyAdmin, rather than a library.
Tim -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
