The PHP guidelines seem rather clear that PHP modules all require a "php-" prefix (with some types of modules requiring additional designations like "php-pear-"). Recently I noticed that two modules, phpFlickr and phpSmug, were both submitted and approved. I held off on doing CVS for the latter; the reviewer's reasoning is as follows: "The php guidelines not withstanding, php-phpSmug struck me as unnecessary duplication and the same with php-phpFlickr." https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510979 In general, I think it's the job of the reviewer to point out issues in the guidelines rather than to simply ignore them. However, what's done is done (unless we want to force a rename of phpFlickr, which has already been imported) but I figured I'd ask if FPC wants to consider ammending the guidelines to cover this case, or suggest another name for this package. Personally I'm not really inclined to an exception, because we have other packages like php-pear-PHP-CodeSniffer.noarch, php-pear-PHPUnit.noarch, php-pear-PhpDocumentor.noarch with no complaints about naming, but also phpTodo, phpMyAdmin and phpPgAdmin which are not modules but applications which happen to have PHP in their names. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
