-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:57:47 +0200, you wrote: >Is Fedora supposed to be a "hardly useful" packages cult which adopts >any package? Provided the quality of certain packages and how certain >reviews are being performed, at least I can't deny this thought. There was a request on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList and because it's a tiny package you may not need a lot of time for maintainmence. For the naming discussion, because Debian use the same name as upstream and Debeian has more packages as Fedora, I see no problem to use the upstream package name for it. At least, of course I have wrote a mail to upstream fo suggest a rename of this package. But until now I haven't got any response. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.10.0 (Build 500) Charset: us-ascii wj8DBQFK4JM8T2AHK6txfgwRAu7NAKCfelOj71rj885HYl1zjXs5RzyK7QCgo+nv wnG80SByeLABizVzKk4YYfA= =d3G1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
