On 10/22/2009 07:15 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:57:47 +0200, you wrote:
Is Fedora supposed to be a "hardly useful" packages cult which adopts
any package? Provided the quality of certain packages and how certain
reviews are being performed, at least I can't deny this thought.
There was a request on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList
OK, it's someone's pony ...
and because it's a tiny package you may not need a lot of time
for maintainmence.
For the naming discussion, because Debian use the same name as
upstream and Debeian has more packages as Fedora, I see no
problem to use the upstream package name for it.
At least, of course I have wrote a mail to upstream fo suggest a
rename of this package. But until now I haven't got any response.
Are you seriously expecting an answer?
Ralf
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
