Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> If it's a bug, then how do you propose a specfile should articulate a
>> "Requires" that *can* be satisfied by any architecture?
>
> Why would it need to?  

dietlibc needs this.  There are the arch specific libs in -devel and the
common 'diet' program in 'dietlibc'.  E.g. 'dietlibc-devel' for x86_64
and i386 can be used both with 'dietlibc' for x86_64 and for i386.



Enrico

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux