On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 19:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Braden McDaniel <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Since apparently a requirement for "foo" can be satisfied by any > > available architecture for which a "foo" is available, "Requires" that > > do not specify the architecture are unsafe for multilib systems (unless > > the dependency really can be satisfied by any architecture--which does > > not strike me as the most common case). > > Surely this is a bug, not something that every single specfile must > work around. If it's a bug, then how do you propose a specfile should articulate a "Requires" that *can* be satisfied by any architecture? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you think the bug is...? -- Braden McDaniel <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
