Re: Explicit "Requires" should (usually) be arch-specific

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Braden McDaniel <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 19:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: 
>> Surely this is a bug, not something that every single specfile must
>> work around.

> If it's a bug, then how do you propose a specfile should articulate a
> "Requires" that *can* be satisfied by any architecture?

Why would it need to?  I should only have to require "foo", I should
not have to know whether foo comes in arch-specific or arch-independent
form.  It should be up to the buildsystem to acquire the version that
is most appropriate for the target arch being built.

			regards, tom lane

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux