Braden McDaniel <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 19:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Surely this is a bug, not something that every single specfile must >> work around. > If it's a bug, then how do you propose a specfile should articulate a > "Requires" that *can* be satisfied by any architecture? Why would it need to? I should only have to require "foo", I should not have to know whether foo comes in arch-specific or arch-independent form. It should be up to the buildsystem to acquire the version that is most appropriate for the target arch being built. regards, tom lane -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
