On 07/23/2009 10:58 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 08:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > [snip] > >> A solution that would meet both upstream and Fedora's usage would be to >> change the build scripts of the packages to substitute the interpreter >> lines in at build time. > > This suggestion really goes to the heart of what makes me uncomfortable > with your proposal: it comes down to asking packages to do something > special for Fedora. And the most compelling reason for this request > appears to be that Fedora's toolchain can't cope. The philosophical > direction this seems to represent is not one I'd like to see Fedora > take. > The toolchain is only a minor point. The major point is that it causes breakage for some end users. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
