On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 01:54 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_(draft) > > I've just submitted this draft. This seems to support the following > feature which I need to find the owner of and coordinate with: The problem I see with this is that it's bound to result in patches that some upstream developers will find unpalatable. Can non-Fedora-specific arguments be made against this practice *that are sufficiently compelling to justify the potential for long-term maintenance of patches*? I say, "non-Fedora-specific" because this is a lot more compelling if the project can say, unequivocally, that Fedora is taking a stand against a generally harmful practice. If, however, the reasons driving this are mostly Fedora-specific, it's a harder sell. Broadly speaking, a distribution like Fedora should be doing its best to adapt to what upstream developers deliver. -- Braden McDaniel <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging