On 08/21/2009 09:18 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 08:58:04AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/21/2009 08:52 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 01:20:08AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
After seeing an argument in a review over someone using a five-space tab
width (?!), I submit the following for flameage:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Tabs
how about no tabs at all. With the exception of fortran and makefiles
let's hang tabs out to die a cold, unloved death.
Yes, please! Especially half-mixed specfiles are fun. Isn't there an
emacs/vim mode for specfiles that could be modified to automatically
untabbify specfiles upon the next edit?
... and tab sensitive portions of a spec (such as Makefile fragments)
will be corrupted ...
There are people embedding Makefile fragments into specfiles?
I don't have an example at hand.
How many
specfiles are there this way and how many packagers do we have to
brainwash to not do that? :)
There is "brainwashed" in appending/cat'ing tab-sensitive
Makefile-/Fortran/sh/text etc. fragments in rpm specs.
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
