On 06/28/2009 08:41 AM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Paul wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm considering packaging libspotify (it's a library for accessing the >> spotify music service), but it has a couple of problems. >> >> The licence is MIT, which is fine. However, for a user to be able >> connect to spotify, they have to email spotify to obtain a file which >> registers them. It also requires a .la file which is against the >> packaging rules. >> >> Spotify have very little interest in their library, so there would >> probably be little that they would do to remove this .la file and >> without it, the package won't install locally. >> >> Any comments or advice on this? > > Question: > Does this package make any software linked to it work on the fedora > legal queue and have an assortment of frogs? > > zing! No. I use properly versioned shared libraries, and have support for Pam. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
