Hi, I just corrected the wording on the MPI Guideline from "NO library configuration (in /etc/ld.so.conf.d) MUST be made" to "library configuration (in /etc/ld.so.conf.d) MUST NOT be made" which is clearer and has the same meaning (it was in the FESCo discussion [1]). I hope that this updated version can be moved to the Packaging Guidelines along with the other guidelines approved today. [1] http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-14/fedora-meeting.2009-08-14-17.01.log.html#l-81 17:20:21 <jds2001> #topic FPC Items 17:20:26 <jds2001> .fesco 241 17:20:29 <jds2001> MPI? 17:20:42 <jds2001> There was something on the page that was confusing to me, let me find it. 17:21:24 <jds2001> ahh - Each MPI build of shared libraries SHOULD have a separate -libs subpackage for the libraries (e.g. foo-mpich2-libs). As in the case of MPI compilers, NO library configuration (in /etc/ld.so.conf.d) MUST be made. 17:21:25 <nirik> +1 here for MPI. It makes sense to me... 17:21:59 <jds2001> that seems to be as "library configuration in /etc/ld.so.conf.d MUST NOT be made" -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
