Le dimanche 19 juillet 2009 à 12:17 -0700, Christopher Stone a écrit : > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Gianluca Sforna<giallu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What about adding an exception for the "add the php- prefix" rule to > > packages that includes "php in their name? > > So, a package called "graphplotter" would be valid because it has php > it its name? The way we do it with fonts is that we require the -fonts suffix but forbid repetition in the root name So you can not have bigfonts-foofont, bigfoofont-fonts or fontofbigfoo-fonts but only big-foo-fonts. Also we require lowercase names and use - as word separator (like other sensible distros such as Debian or Suse who didn't let their package namespace polluted by WeirdCamelCaseNames). Arguably, the decision was easier to make since font authors do not follow any particular logic in naming their archives and a typical font includes many layers of naming that usually do not agree on case and separators. Anyway, that was mainly to dispell the impression our naming conventions are consistent accross sigs. Every SIG makes its own rules and as long as they are internally consistent (all packages of the same kind are named the same way) no one cares much. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
