On 07/19/2009 10:18 AM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Tim Jackson<lists@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Maybe, but it makes it sound like the library is called "Flickr" rather than >> "phpFlickr". I wouldn't necessarily think that "php-Flickr" is the same >> thing as "phpFlickr". So I'd personally prefer the clumsier but more >> accurate php-phpFlickr. > > What about adding an exception for the "add the php- prefix" rule to > packages that includes "php in their name? > > Pyhton has something similar: > If the upstream source has "py" (or "Py") in its name, you can use > that name for the package. So, for example, pygtk is acceptable. > That's possible. OTOH, I personally have argued for removing that from the python Guidelines (old package grandfathered in, new packages needing to be python-pygtk, for example). -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
