Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi,
Oolite <http://oolite.org> is currently undergoing review, and a
stumbling block is in its use of its own copy of libjs. An upstream
developer is participating in the review and has a clear explanation
for the rationale:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211
libjs is not exposed to any network interfaces, so the risk is
probably quite low -- the alternative is to wait until xulrunner 2.0
is released (the previous stable version has problems in its scripting
mechanism and most third-party add-ons for Oolite do not work on it
anymore.
Would it be alright in this case to bundle libjs?
PS the "no bundled libraries" draft
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries) does
not clearly indicate which mailing list is to be used
Thanks,
This list is fine.
Based on what I see in the BZ, I'd much rather see you wait until they
get on the current libjs, especially since it sounds fairly immanent.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
