On Monday 29 June 2009, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > The included jar files have been removed. I change the property that is > used to build the class path to point to the Fedora version of the need jar > file (jdom) for building purposes. However after the build the resulting > jar file still has a manifest with a classpath in it. It should be trivial to get rid of that as well, just search for a MANIFEST.MF template used or the build.xml section that generates it, and patch it out. > It seems like the > only downside is you can't override the classpath when using the -jar > option to run the jar file. That's really the issue. It may cause other nasty and hard to debug surprises if another app uses the jar. Class-Path entries in jar manifests are kind of like RPATHs and should be avoided for the same reasons, at least for jars installed in system jar paths (e.g. /usr/share/java). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging