Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - Dec 2, 2009 - 1600 UTC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/24/2009 01:17 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> And an FPC decision seems necessary about package name
> - most of old packages (>70) use only - (ex php-pear-Auth-SASL)
> - some recent packages use mixed - and _ (ex php-pear-Auth_HTTP)
> See
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-php-devel-list/2009-July/thread.html

FWIW, I'd prefer the underscore not be used, but the guidelines
currently permit it, assuming it is inherited from upstream's naming.
However, given that practically all other packaged PHP modules use -, I
could see the merit in requiring PHP packages to replace - with _. Is
that what the PHP SIG is asking for FPC to approve?

~spot


--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux