On 09/02/2009 05:47 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Michel Alexandre Salim (michael.silvanus@xxxxxxxxx) said:
Multi-ownership seems *far* preferable to me than using triggers to
move files around, or moving a prelink-specific directory to the base
filesystem package.
Then the guidelines should be fixed to create less confusion over the
matter.
Another precedence is with bash-completion -- the consensus is for
packages that provide completion scripts to own /etc/bash_completion.d
OK, I've written up the following, which should be more clear:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BillNottingham/DirectoryDraft
Comments?
This proposal goes into the right direction. However I find it somewhat
confusing, because it doesn't mention the actual rationales/motivations
for when to apply "multiple owners" or "package deps"
(The rationale is strict and permanent package hierarchies
vs. "no or varying hierarchies")
Ralf
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
