On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:25:16PM +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:08:15 -0500 > "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 11/23/2009 11:04 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > The Fedora Packaging Committee will have its next meeting on > > > Tuesday, November 24, 2009 @ 1600 UTC, in #fedora-meeting. Here is > > > the tentative agenda: > > > > Scratch that, this is wrong. I had forgotten that we'd moved to > > Wednesdays, and this coming Wednesday will not work due to the > > Thanksgiving holiday in the US. > > > > Lets try this again. > > > > The Fedora Packaging Committee will have its next meeting on > > Wednesday, December 2, 2009 @ 1600 UTC, in #fedora-meeting. Here is > > the tentative agenda: > > > > * pkgconfig autorequires: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PkgconfigAutoRequires > > A quick comment on this: if pkgconfig isn't an explicit dependency, > what provides the ownership of the %{_libdir}/pkgconfig directory? > > If all packages with .pc files omit the pkgconfig dependency, there > will be nothing actually pulling in pkgconfig itself, will there? > pkgconfig should now be an automatic dependency. If you know of any corner cases where rpm doesn't autodetect, we should note those. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp6hSTbKoLCG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
