Martin Gieseking wrote:
Hi,
according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988#c14
packages shouldn't get names that are general terms like "parser" or
"smtp". If this is actually the case, "ascii" is probably an
inappropriate name too.
Should the package requested in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523799
therefore be prefixed or renamed even if "ascii" is the upstream name?
Or is it OK as is, after all?
Regards,
Martin
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
I vote rename. I've not looked at the review, and I've no idea what the
package does. And googling it might be tricky.
-J
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
