On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 09:23:13AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > The spec template in the Sugar packaging guidelines > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SugarActivityGuidelines) > indicates that the package should not own %{sugaractivitydir} (which > evaluates to /usr/share/sugar/activities). Unfortunately, this means > nothing in the filesystem owns that directory because sugar itself > doesn't own it for some reason. > > I would suggest that the simplest way to fix it would be to have the > sugar package own that directory, but alternately we could fix the sugar > packaging guidelines and fix up all of the activity packages. > I asked dgilmore (since he wrote the Sugar Activity Guidelines). He took a look and said: [12:02:51] <dgilmore> abadger1999: sugar should own it and for some reason it looks like we never added it I've opened a bug to have that corrected: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532796 -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpAW88SKCZWR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
