On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:00:50 +0100, Patrice wrote: > There should be no foo-devel-static. But I am not sure that there is a need > to change the guideline since it doesn't mention the devel-static > possibility. So, we should get rid of the six remaining -devel-static packages then. One is in F12 "updates", btw. ;) One at RPM Fusion. Though, without hanging around on IRC I still don't know whether I could simply go ahead and fix the packages for F13 devel or if this would be a case of filing tickets and waiting many months for a reaction. > But once again, I think that the guidelines are clear on that subject: Well, I do too, but that's the theory only as I've found two review requests that create the full set of libfoo, libfoo-static + virtual libfoo-devel and libfoo-devel-static in libfoo-static. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
