On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 22:49 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 05:06:18PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Jussi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I'd like to suggest > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ChangelogStyles > > > for discussion. > > > > Not a good idea. Different people do this differently, and > > since some of those people are doing bulk rebuilds, there's no > > way to guarantee that exactly the same format will be followed > > in all the historical entries in a changelog. Or do you envision > > that people will actually retroactively change old log entries > > to match their preferred format? Now *that* would be a bad idea. > > > I pretty much agree with Tom's arguments here. Jussi, if you want to put > this up for a vote you can but I don't think it would pass without showing: > > 1) what the benefits are > > 2) how to address Tom's concerns about old log entries, multiple > maintainers, etc. Yes, I'm pulling this one out. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
