Obsoletes in renamed rubygem a blocker?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi there,

I've had rubygem-net-ldap packaged and deployed throughout my company, e.g. on all development workstations and on all dev/test/beta/prod servers.

My company is letting me package this ruby gem for Fedora as well, along with a bunch of other ruby gems. During the review[1], M. Tasaka suggested the name should have been rubygem-ruby-net-ldap instead, and so I added an Obsoletes header for rubygem-net-ldap.

This is now a blocker for M. Tasaka to approve the package, but if and when I remove it, and the new package is in Fedora I have to manually update all of approximately 40-50 development workstations and Fedora servers. I just need that Obsoletes header to be in the RPM, and that RPM with that header to be in the updates repository once.

More details are in the review request[1], and I would appreciate your opinion on this Obsoletes header becoming a blocker.

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux